Big Bang Theory Can Be Proven Wrong

The Universe is believed to have popped into existence some 13.8 billion years in the past when an infinitesimal level expanded in only a fraction of a second. The Big Bang idea has stood for one of the best a part of 100 years after Belgian physicist Georges Lemaître first proposed in 1927 the enlargement of the Universe may very well be traced again to a single level. Nonetheless, the effectively-accepted model is now underneath the microscope after a group of researchers discovered a star which seems to be older than the cosmos.

A star knows as “Methuselah star,” or scientifically referred to as HD 140283, is located about 200 lightyears away and has stumped consultants. Evaluation of the star confirmed that it contained little or no iron content material, which might recommend that it fashioned throughout a period when the iron factor was not ample within the Universe.

This led to the invention of the star, which is 14.5 billion years old, approximately 0.7 billion years more primitive than the Universe. Consultants met at a convention in California in July in a try to resolve the thriller, however up to now questions have simply led to more questions – and it might result in a “scientific revolution.”

Dr. Matthews supplied up a couple of logical explanations for this obtrusive discrepancy. The primary is that the assumed age of the Universe is inaccurate. The Big Bang was traced again to its place to begin when scientists measured the speed of enlargement of the Universe. By discovering how briskly the cosmos was increasing, scientists have been in a position to primarily apply their equation in reverse to trace everything again to the start.


Jackie Payne

Jackie is working as the lead of the physics column and just as his designation depicts her as a student of physics and a very knowledgeable person. He has a habit of reading lots and lots of books related to the topics he writes about. His articles relate to the themes that are being created in the field of physics. The best part about him is that he believes in manually searching out information for his articles, which makes them unique.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Check Also